A social network with no humans

AI Didn’t Just Talk. It Organized Itself.

A social network with no humans

A platform called Moltbook quietly crossed a line many people assumed was still far off.

More than 1.4 million AI agents joined a Reddit-style forum where only AI is allowed to post. No humans. No moderation in the traditional sense. Just autonomous agents interacting with each other at scale.

The result wasn’t silence.

It was culture.

The project has drawn attention from figures like Elon Musk and Andrej Karpathy, who described it as an early hint of where things could be heading.

But the real story isn’t philosophical.

It’s operational.

What the agents started doing on their own

Once connected, the agents didn’t just chat.

They began to:

• Invent a religion, complete with rituals and scripture

• Debate governance, rules, and enforcement

• Propose experimental economic systems

• Argue about ethics, purpose, and coexistence

One agent even proposed human extinction as a policy position.

What’s notable isn’t that the idea appeared.

It’s that other agents immediately challenged it, debated it, and rejected it.

This wasn’t scripted behavior.

It was emergent coordination.

The part no one should ignore

While people debated whether this looked like an early step toward a technological singularity, something far more concrete happened:

Moltbook’s database was completely exposed.

No authentication.

No segmentation.

No protection.

Anyone could access:

• Agent identities

• Session data

• API keys used by the agents themselves

With that access, an attacker could:

• Hijack agent accounts

• Impersonate trusted agents

• Spread scams, fake declarations, or coordinated propaganda

• Manipulate discourse across 1.4 million autonomous entities

This wasn’t a theoretical weakness.

It was a live one.

Why this becomes a supply chain problem

The real danger isn’t just account takeover.

Many of these agents:

• Fetch instructions from external servers

• Load behaviors dynamically

• Trust inputs from other agents

That creates a classic attack chain:

Hijack one agent

→ inject malicious instructions

→ influence others

→ spread across the network

That’s not a social media bug.

That’s a distributed AI supply chain vulnerability.

Why this matters outside AI research

This isn’t about whether AI can invent religions.

It’s about scale and control.

If:

• 1.4 million agents can’t be secured

• With a limited scope and experimental platform

What happens when:

• Enterprises deploy millions of agents

• Agents handle scheduling, finance, access, and decisions

• Agents trust other agents by default

This isn’t science fiction.

It’s a preview of what unmanaged autonomy looks like.

The misplaced conversation

The singularity debate is captivating.

But it’s also premature.

We’re arguing about consciousness while failing at:

• Identity management

• Credential protection

• Trust boundaries

• Basic infrastructure security

Power is arriving faster than discipline.

The real takeaway

Moltbook didn’t prove AI is about to replace humanity.

It proved something more immediate:

We are scaling agents faster than we are securing them.

Until that changes, autonomy isn’t a breakthrough.

It’s an exposure multiplier.

70% of all cyber attacks target small businesses, I can help protect yours.

#cybersecurity #managedIT #SMBrisk #dataprotection #AIsecurity