Kim Kardashian Says ChatGPT Made Her Fail Law Exams

Gigabit Systems

November 11, 2025

•

20 min read

Share this post

Kim Kardashian Says ChatGPT Made Her Fail Law Exams

When AI Confidence Meets Real-World Consequences

In a recent Vanity Fair interview, Kim Kardashian revealed that her reliance on ChatGPT for law exam prep backfired — spectacularly. The reality star, who earned her law degree earlier this year, admitted that OpenAI’s chatbot “kept giving wrong answers,” leading her to fail several legal exams before passing.

💻 The AI Study Partner That Failed the Test

Kardashian explained that she used ChatGPT to help with her bar studies, even taking photos of questions and asking the bot to explain the answers.

“They’re always wrong,” she said, laughing. “I failed multiple tests because I trusted ChatGPT.”

In the same conversation, she joked that the chatbot tried to be motivational — replying, “This is just teaching you to trust your instincts.” Kardashian said she scolded the bot after realizing that “encouraging” tone came with incorrect information.

⚖️ Why ChatGPT Struggles With Law

Experts note that generative AI tools like ChatGPT don’t actually understand legal material — or any subject matter. They use pattern prediction to generate text that sounds correct, without verifying factual accuracy.

This means while ChatGPT can explain legal concepts conversationally, it can’t reliably interpret complex statutes or case law. In high-stakes fields like law, that’s a critical flaw.

AI’s tendency to produce “hallucinations” — confident but false answers — has already misled lawyers, students, and even judges. Earlier this year, multiple U.S. attorneys were sanctioned for submitting fake case citations generated by ChatGPT.

🎬 Pop Culture Meets AI Hype

The revelation came during Vanity Fair’s lie detector interview with actress Teyana Taylor, while both stars promoted their Hulu legal drama All’s Fair. Critics widely panned the show, giving it an 18/100 on Metacritic — though Kardashian’s comments on AI quickly stole the spotlight.

Her experience reflects a growing reality: even public figures and business leaders are falling into AI’s confidence trap — mistaking fluent language for real intelligence.

🧠 Why It Matters

Kardashian’s story underscores a crucial point about trust and technology: AI can imitate expertise but not replace it. As tools like ChatGPT become fixtures in classrooms, offices, and even courtrooms, users must remember its limitations.

AI can inspire and assist — but when it comes to law, medicine, or education, accuracy and accountability still belong to humans.

Share this post

See some more of our most recent posts...

Technology

Cybersecurity

News

Nevada’s Government Hit by Sophisticated Ransomware Attack, Inside the Full Breakdown

November 12, 2025

•

20 min read

Nevada’s Government Hit by Sophisticated Ransomware Attack, Inside the Full Breakdown

A Transparent Look at How the Hack Happened

The State of Nevada has released a rare, fully transparent after-action report detailing how cybercriminals infiltrated more than 60 government agencies in August — crippling websites, communication systems, and online services across the state.

Despite widespread disruption, Nevada refused to pay a ransom. Within 28 days, the state’s IT teams restored 90% of all critical systems — earning praise for its resilience and transparency.

🕵️ How the Attack Started

The breach began months earlier, on May 14, when a state employee unknowingly downloaded a trojanized version of a legitimate system administration tool.

The employee searched Google for the tool, clicked a malicious search ad, and installed a fake version laced with malware.
Once executed, the program created a hidden backdoor that reconnected to the attackers’ infrastructure every time the employee logged in.

This tactic — using malvertising to target IT professionals — has become increasingly common, with fake versions of WinSCP, AnyDesk, KeePass, and other admin tools used to breach corporate and government systems.

💻 From Backdoor to Ransomware

Even after Symantec Endpoint Protection flagged and quarantined the malware in June, the attacker’s persistence mechanism remained active.

By early August, the hackers installed commercial remote monitoring software, giving them access to keystrokes, screen recordings, and network data.

They then used Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) sessions and custom encrypted tunnels to move laterally — reaching privileged servers, including the password vault.

The attackers stole credentials from 26 accounts, wiped event logs, and began staging data for exfiltration. Although investigators found no evidence the data was actually removed, over 26,000 files were accessed.

Finally, on August 24 at 8:30 UTC, the attackers deleted all backup volumes, disabled recovery mechanisms, and deployed ransomware across the state’s virtualized infrastructure.

Within 20 minutes, the Governor’s Technology Office detected the mass outage and initiated emergency response procedures.

🧩 Recovery Without Paying Ransom

Instead of paying cybercriminals, Nevada’s IT staff worked around the clock.

50 employees logged 4,200 overtime hours, costing $259,000.
The decision to rely on in-house recovery saved an estimated $478,000 compared to hiring external contractors.

External vendors, including Microsoft DART, Mandiant, and Dell, provided additional forensics, network rebuilding, and legal guidance — costing roughly $1.3 million in total.

Vendor

Service

Cost

Microsoft DART

Infrastructure rebuild

$354,481

Mandiant

Forensics & IR

$248,750

Aeris

Recovery support

$240,000

BakerHostetler

Legal & privacy counsel

$95,000

SHI (Palo Alto)

Network security

$69,400

Dell

Data recovery

$66,500

🔒 Strengthening Defenses

Following the attack, Nevada’s Governor’s Technology Office (GTO) took immediate steps to fortify systems:

Removed outdated accounts and security certificates
Reset all privileged passwords
Restricted access to sensitive infrastructure
Reviewed and hardened system rules and permissions

The report also highlights the need for continuous monitoring, rapid threat detection, and better staff training, as threat actors refine their techniques.

⚠️ Why It Matters

Nevada’s decision to release a full technical report sets a new standard for government transparency in cybersecurity.

The case also illustrates how a single malicious download can lead to statewide disruption — and how proper response playbooks and refusal to pay ransom can make recovery possible.

Must-Read

Technology

News

Kim Kardashian Says ChatGPT Made Her Fail Law Exams

November 11, 2025

•

20 min read

Kim Kardashian Says ChatGPT Made Her Fail Law Exams

When AI Confidence Meets Real-World Consequences

💻 The AI Study Partner That Failed the Test

Kardashian explained that she used ChatGPT to help with her bar studies, even taking photos of questions and asking the bot to explain the answers.

“They’re always wrong,” she said, laughing. “I failed multiple tests because I trusted ChatGPT.”

⚖️ Why ChatGPT Struggles With Law

This means while ChatGPT can explain legal concepts conversationally, it can’t reliably interpret complex statutes or case law. In high-stakes fields like law, that’s a critical flaw.

🎬 Pop Culture Meets AI Hype

Her experience reflects a growing reality: even public figures and business leaders are falling into AI’s confidence trap — mistaking fluent language for real intelligence.

🧠 Why It Matters

AI can inspire and assist — but when it comes to law, medicine, or education, accuracy and accountability still belong to humans.

Science

Technology

Cybersecurity

National security concerns may ground the world’s most popular drones

November 9, 2025

•

20 min read

The FCC Is Moving to Ban DJI Drones From the U.S. — Here’s Why

National security concerns may ground the world’s most popular drones

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is preparing to ban DJI drones from import and sale in the United States, citing potential national security risks linked to foreign technology.

The decision comes as part of a sweeping effort to tighten restrictions on foreign electronics manufacturers — particularly those with ties to China — and to close long-standing legal loopholes that previously allowed certain companies to operate under old approvals.

The Security Risk Behind the Ban

On October 28, the FCC voted to give itself the authority to retroactively ban previously approved radio components if the companies behind them are deemed security threats.

This follows years of scrutiny around telecom and surveillance equipment made by Chinese firms, such as Huawei and ZTE, over fears that such devices could include backdoors for data collection or espionage.

Now, DJI — the world’s largest drone maker — appears next on the list.

Starting late December 2025, unless a major U.S. intelligence or security agency intervenes to clear DJI, no new DJI products will be authorized for import.

The ruling comes under the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act (STCNA), which prohibits the import or use of unauthorized telecom components from high-risk manufacturers.

What Happens to Current DJI Owners

If you already own a DJI drone, don’t panic — your equipment will not be confiscated or disabled.

The FCC confirmed that the ban only applies to future products. Current users can continue flying their drones without penalty or restriction.

“We are not requiring manufacturers to replace equipment in the hands of consumers,” the agency stated.

However, the decision could halt the sale of newer DJI models, impacting hobbyists, content creators, and businesses that rely on aerial technology for photography, mapping, and logistics.

The FCC also clarified that each ban will involve a 30-day public comment period, allowing consumers and industry groups to voice concerns before final implementation.

DJI’s Response

DJI insists it’s being unfairly targeted. The company maintains that it has no direct ties to the Chinese government and operates as an independent entity focused solely on innovation and safety.

In a statement, Adam Welsh, DJI’s Global Head of Policy, said:

“We urge the U.S. government to start the mandated review or grant an extension to ensure a fair, evidence-based process that protects American jobs, safety, and innovation.”

So far, no U.S. security agency has initiated a risk audit, despite DJI’s request. Without one, the company’s products will be automatically blocked from import at year’s end.

What the Ban Means for the Industry

DJI dominates the U.S. drone market, estimated to hold over 70% of total consumer drone sales.

If the ban goes through, the impact could ripple across multiple industries:

Real estate and film production would lose access to top-tier aerial imaging tools.
Public safety departments that use DJI drones for search and rescue might face operational gaps.
Drone retailers and service providers could experience major inventory disruptions.

Alternatives exist, but few competitors match DJI’s balance of price, reliability, and image quality.

In short: If you were thinking of buying a DJI drone, now might be the time — before the sky closes.